The research appears in journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.The results indicated that the participants were considered to have high blood pressure if their systolic blood pressure was 140 or greater, their diastolic blood pressure was 90 or greater, or if they had been previously diagnosed with hypertension and were taking antihypertensive medication.. Gibson from St.Study author Todd M.Certain groups of survivors were the most likely to have hypertension: men; non-Hispanic blacks, older survivors, and those who were overweight or obese, the study showed.The study showed that the prevalence of hypertension was 2. The research has shown that high blood pressure can have an even greater negative impact on survivors of childhood cancer, who were treated with cardiotoxic therapies such as anthracyclines or chest radiation, Gibson added.Washington: People, especially overweight or obese men, who have China Gas Safety Device Pressure Gauge Manufacturers survived childhood cancer, are more than twice as likely to suffer from high blood pressure as adults.
The prevalence of hypertension increased over time - at age 30, 13 percent of the survivors had hypertension; at 40, 37 percent had hypertension, and by age 50, more than 70 percent of the survivors had hypertension.Gibson said the prevalence of hypertension in cancer survivors matched rates in the general population of people about a decade older. Jude Childrens Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee said that high blood pressure is an important modifiable risk factor that increases risk of heart problems in everyone. The researchers explained that exposure to radiotherapy or chemotherapy were not significantly associated with hypertension. To assess the prevalence of high blood pressure among survivors of childhood cancer, the team examined 3,016 adults.6 times higher among childhood cancer survivors than expected. "The good news is that, unlike prior cancer therapy, high blood pressure is a modifiable risk factor," Gibson noted
Since it’s a smartwatch, it can also display notifications from your smartphone, although it hasn’t been mentioned which OS it is going to use. None of them has been able to address the parameter that matters the most to those who can actually afford one — blood pressure.(source).
The HeartGuide is currently undergoing testing with the FDA and will be priced equivalent to an Apple Watch Series 3, when launched. However, Omron — responsible for making medical-grade blood pressure monitors have addressed the elephant in the room with their new HeartGuide smartwatch — a wearable that can actively track your blood pressure.The HeartGuide can also track blood pressure while you are asleep along with steps and calories. For those concerned with the battery life, Omron is claiming an average stamina between 10 days to two weeks, which is pretty good for a wearable with a display. It also takes heart rate measurements, following which it syncs the data with the Omron app and is available to your doctor for further inspection.The HeartGuide smartwatch looks like any other conventional smartwatch. The watch’s extra-stiff band inflates to take an oscillometric measurement, similar to the cuffs that doctors use to gauge blood pressure.If you evaluate the features of a full-blown fitness tracker today, you will notice that they are limited to tracking steps, calories and monitoring heart rate. However, it differs completely on the inside as it China Gas Safety Device Pressure Gauge Manufacturers is one of the first ones with the ability to measure blood pressure
"Would it be good news for North Korea if the oil stopped flowing? No. Tens, and possibly hundreds, of thousands of Chinese soldiers, including Mao Zedongs son, died to save North Korea from obliteration during the Korean War, and China is essentially Pyongyangs economic lifeline, responsible for most of its trade and oil.Although North Korea takes pride in its ability to absorb pain, be it war, famine, sanctions or condemnation, Chinas tougher line will rob Pyongyang of key sources of foreign currency.North Korea gets its oil from China out of convenience, not necessity, according to Pierre Noel, an energy security specialist at the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank.
There are ample hydrocarbons in North Korea to substitute for those it imports from China. "But Chinas `emotions toward North Korea dont drive its policy. The war is often seen as the backbone of the countries alliance, he said, but the North blamed the failure to conquer the South on Beijing, which had seized control of field operations after the near-annihilation of North Korean forces."It is true that China loathes North Korea and vice versa _ at the societal level, the leadership level and the governmental level," Van Jackson, a North Korea specialist and lecturer at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, wrote earlier in 2017.Last month, North Korean state media accused Chinese state-controlled media of "going under the armpit of the US" by criticizing Pyongyang.This matters because if China is not the solution to the nuclear crisis, then outsiders long sold on the idea must recalibrate their efforts as the North approaches a viable arsenal of nuclear-tipped missiles capable of reaching the US mainland, something the CIA chief this week estimated as only a matter of months away."The North Koreans have always driven China crazy," says John Delury, an expert on both countries at Seouls Yonsei University, "and, for their part, the North Koreans have always felt betrayed by China.The reality, however, is that the complicated, often exasperating, relationship is less about friendship or political bonds than a deep and mutually uneasy dependency. But both sides need each other in elemental ways.North Korea relies on China for most of its oil, and outsiders have long argued that the best way to cripple the Norths economy and force it to submit would be to persuade Beijing to cut that flow.His late father, Kim Jong II, hated to travel but went to China eight times during his rule, and Chinese leaders reciprocated with trips to Pyongyang.Still, nothing China has done offsets its underlying fear that too much external pressure could collapse the government in Pyongyang." This, he said, is "a recipe for continued failure."It can be argued that the North Korea-China relationship never really recovered from Beijings decision in 1992 to establish formal diplomatic relations with Seoul. Is it likely to cripple the economy and force the government to change course on their foremost strategic priority? No.His late father, Kim Jong II, hated to travel but went to China eight times during his rule, and Chinese leaders reciprocated with trips to Pyongyang.By so doing, US officials failed to see the limits of Chinese influence in the North, Person wrote last month on the 38 North website. There are ample hydrocarbons in North Korea to substitute for those it imports from China.North Korea relies on China for most of its oil, and outsiders have long argued that the best way to cripple the Norths economy and force it to submit would be to persuade Beijing to cut that flow.The countries, after all, share a long, porous border, several millennia of history and deep ideological roots. North Korean nuclear tests set off earthquakes near the Chinese border and raise fears of radioactive contamination.But a big part of North Koreas "profound sense of mistrust" and "long-term effort to resist Chinas influence" stems from the 1950-53 Korean War, according to James Person, a Korea expert at the Wilson Center think tank in Washington. The war is often seen as the backbone of the countries alliance, he said, but the North blamed the failure to conquer the South on Beijing, which had seized Gas safety device pressure gauge control of field operations after the near-annihilation of North Korean forces. The nightmare scenario for Beijing is North Korean refugees flooding into its northeast after Seoul takes power in Pyongyang and US and South Korean troops occupy lands that were once considered a buffer zone.".North Korean missile tests hurt trade and tourism and strengthen the US presence in a region that China believes it should dominate.But even this may not work. Nominally allies, the neighbours operate in a near constant state of tension, a mix of ancient distrust and dislike and the grating knowledge that they are inextricably tangled up with each other, however much they might chafe against it.This growing disdain is reflected in Chinas willingness to permit criticism of the North in the press, and to allow tougher sanctions at the UN Beijing has suspended coal, iron ore, seafood and textiles from the North.The countries, after all, share a long, porous border, several millennia of history and deep ideological roots. Some observers question whether China could force a change in the North, short of military intervention, even if it wanted to."Read: Kim Jong Un threatens US of unimaginable nuclear strikeThe View from North Korea: "Profound Mistrust"One way to gauge Pyongyangs feelings for Beijing is to consider that Kim Jong Un has yet to visit his only major ally, a country that accounts for 90 percent of North Korean trade, since taking power in December 2011.North Korean missile tests hurt trade and tourism and strengthen the US presence in a region that China believes it should dominate.In fact, North Korea has seemingly sought to humiliate Beijing by timing some of its missile tests for major global summits in China.The notion of Chinese power over the North — that the countries are as "close as lips and teeth, according to a cliche recorded in the 3rd century — is so tantalizing that Donald Trump has spent a good part of his young presidency playing it up."It can be argued that the North Korea-China relationship never really recovered from Beijings decision in 1992 to establish formal diplomatic relations with Seoul.The reality, however, is that the complicated, often exasperating, relationship is less about friendship or political bonds than a deep and mutually uneasy dependency."Yet, nearly four decades later, asking China to solve the North Korean problem remains Washingtons default policy for dealing with Pyongyang.This matters because if China is not the solution to the nuclear crisis, then outsiders long sold on the idea must recalibrate their efforts as the North approaches a viable arsenal of nuclear-tipped missiles capable of reaching the US mainland, something the CIA chief this week estimated as only a matter of months away.As China rises as an economic, military and diplomatic heavyweight whose reach extends from the Americas to Asia, many here resent being dragged down by an impoverished, stubborn, Third World dictatorship that allows its people to go hungry while its leader lives in luxury and expands a nuclear arsenal that could lead to war with Washington.But a big part of North Koreas "profound sense of mistrust" and "long-term effort to resist Chinas influence" stems from the 1950-53 Korean War, according to James Person, a Korea expert at the Wilson Center think tank in Washington. The nightmare scenario for Beijing is North Korean refugees flooding into its northeast after Seoul takes power in Pyongyang and US and South Korean troops occupy lands that were once considered a buffer zone."Beijing has also argued that it has less power over North Korea than people think.This growing disdain is reflected in Chinas willingness to permit criticism of the North in the press, and to allow tougher sanctions at the UN Beijing has suspended coal, iron ore, seafood and textiles from the North."Beijing has also argued that it has less power over North Korea than people think.In the 1970s, with North Korea pushing the United States for a peace treaty to replace the Korean War ceasefire that continues today, Washington chose to work through China. In May, the North vowed to "never beg for the maintenance of friendship with China (or risk North Koreas) nuclear program which is as precious as its own life, no matter how valuable the friendship is.But even this may not work.Beijing: At first glance, it seems the perfect solution to the worlds most dangerous standoff: Find a way to get China to use its enormous influence to force North Korea to abandon its nuclear bombs.Although North Korea takes pride in its ability to absorb pain, be it war, famine, sanctions or condemnation, Chinas tougher line will rob Pyongyang of key sources of foreign currency."It is true that China loathes North Korea and vice versa _ at the societal level, the leadership level and the governmental level," Van Jackson, a North Korea specialist and lecturer at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, wrote earlier in 2017."Beijing: At first glance, it seems the perfect solution to the worlds most dangerous standoff: Find a way to get China to use its enormous influence to force North Korea to abandon its nuclear bombs.By so doing, US officials failed to see the limits of Chinese influence in the North, Person wrote last month on the 38 North website. Some observers question whether China could force a change in the North, short of military intervention, even if it wanted to. Tens, and possibly hundreds, of thousands of Chinese soldiers, including Mao Zedongs son, died to save North Korea from obliteration during the Korean War, and China is essentially Pyongyangs economic lifeline, responsible for most of its trade and oil. North Korean nuclear tests set off earthquakes near the Chinese border and raise fears of radioactive contamination."Yet, nearly four decades later, asking China to solve the North Korean problem remains Washingtons default policy for dealing with Pyongyang.North Korea gets its oil from China out of convenience, not necessity, according to Pierre Noel, an energy security specialist at the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank."Would it be good news for North Korea if the oil stopped flowing? No.Last month, North Korean state media accused Chinese state-controlled media of "going under the armpit of the US" by criticizing Pyongyang. Is it likely to cripple the economy and force the government to change course on their foremost strategic priority? No." This, he said, is "a recipe for continued failure. "But Chinas `emotions toward North Korea dont drive its policy. Nominally allies, the neighbours operate in a near constant state of tension, a mix of ancient distrust and dislike and the grating knowledge that they are inextricably tangled up with each other, however much they might chafe against it. But both sides need each other in elemental ways."Read: Asia tour hinged on preventing standoff with N Korea: China can expect pressure from Trump, say officialsThe View from China: "Kim Fatty" One clue about how Chinese see the North can be seen in two widespread nicknames for the overweight, third-generation North Korean leader, Kim Jong Un: Kim Fatty The Third and Kim Fat Fat Fat.Since communication at the highest levels has now virtually disappeared, Kim Jong Un feels little need to pay attention when Beijing calls on him to stop testing nukes and missiles." The View from North Korea: "Profound Mistrust" One way to gauge Pyongyangs feelings for Beijing is to consider that Kim Jong Un has yet to visit his only major ally, a country that accounts for 90 percent of North Korean trade, since taking power in December 2011.In fact, North Korea has seemingly sought to humiliate Beijing by timing some of its missile tests for major global summits in China.As China rises as an economic, military and diplomatic heavyweight whose reach extends from the Americas to Asia, many here resent being dragged down by an impoverished, stubborn, Third World dictatorship that allows its people to go hungry while its leader lives in luxury and expands a nuclear arsenal that could lead to war with Washington.Theres also scorn for the Norths brutal, nepotistic brand of socialism, and displeasure that North Korean aggression led South Korea to allow on its territory a US anti-missile system that Beijing says can be used to spy on its operations.Theres also scorn for the Norths brutal, nepotistic brand of socialism, and displeasure that North Korean aggression led South Korea to allow on its territory a US anti-missile system that Beijing says can be used to spy on its operations.The notion of Chinese power over the North — that the countries are as "close as lips and teeth, according to a cliche recorded in the 3rd century — is so tantalizing that Donald Trump has spent a good part of his young presidency playing it up." The View from China: "Kim Fatty" One clue about how Chinese see the North can be seen in two widespread nicknames for the overweight, third-generation North Korean leader, Kim Jong Un: Kim Fatty The Third and Kim Fat Fat Fat.Since communication at the highest levels has now virtually disappeared, Kim Jong Un feels little need to pay attention when Beijing calls on him to stop testing nukes and missiles."The North Koreans have always driven China crazy," says John Delury, an expert on both countries at Seouls Yonsei University, "and, for their part, the North Koreans have always felt betrayed by China. In May, the North vowed to "never beg for the maintenance of friendship with China (or risk North Koreas) nuclear program which is as precious as its own life, no matter how valuable the friendship is.In the 1970s, with North Korea pushing the United States for a peace treaty to replace the Korean War ceasefire that continues today, Washington chose to work through China.Still, nothing China has done offsets its underlying fear that too much external pressure could collapse the government in Pyongyang
The American Heart Association recommends the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet or a Mediterranean-style diet to help prevent cardiovascular disease."."Chronic high blood pressure is tied to an increased risk of heart disease, heart attack, stroke and heart failure.People who eat lots of fruits, veggies, and whole grains may still have an increased risk of elevated blood pressure if they consume a lot of salt, a new study suggests. Another limitation is that surveys used to assess eating habits can be unreliable snapshots of what people actually consume."Even though potassium can help lessen the blood pressure-raising effects of sodium, eating more potassium isn’t a license to eat more sodium," Anderson said.
This is difficult since, as a result of commercial food processing, salt is almost everywhere in the food supply.In the current study, researchers examined data on sodium and potassium levels in urine, as well as blood pressure, height, weight and eating habits from adults aged 40 to 59 in Japan, China, the UK and the USHigher sodium levels were associated with elevated blood pressure for both men and women at all ages in the study, regardless of race and ethnicity or socioeconomic status. Both diets emphasize cooking with vegetable oils with unsaturated fats, eating nuts, fruits, vegetables, low-fat dairy products, whole grains, fish and poultry, and limiting red meat and added sugars and salt."The solution is reduction in salt intake," Stamler said.To see how diet might influence the connection between salt and blood pressure, researchers examined data from food surveys completed by 4,680 middle-aged adults, and determined the amount of 80 nutrients in each person’s diet.Eating high-sodium foods has long been associated with raised blood pressure readings, but some evidence suggests that body weight and EN3 Certified Gauges other nutrients in the diet may modify or offset the effects of sodium on blood pressure.
The connection between sodium and blood pressure was similarly strong for both normal weight and obese people in the study, although the connection was weaker for overweight individuals who weren’t obese.Extra sodium in the bloodstream can pull water into the blood vessels and boost blood pressure by increasing the amount of fluid the heart needs to pump through the body.Even so, the results add to evidence that managing blood pressure requires paying attention to salt, said Cheryl Anderson, a researcher at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine who wasn’t involved in the study.To lower the risk of heart disease, adults should reduce sodium intake to less than 2 grams a day, or the equivalent of about one teaspoon of table salt, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). Jeremiah Stamler of the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago.Sodium is found not only in salt, but also in a variety of foods such as bread, milk, eggs, meat and shellfish as well as processed items like soup, pretzels, popcorn, soy sauce and bouillon cubes."This matters because it indicates that the problem of excess salt intake and its adverse effects on blood pressure cannot be solved by augmenting the diet with other nutrients," said lead study author Dr.With the exception of potassium, none of these nutrients appeared to weaken the connection between eating a high-sodium diet and having higher average blood pressure readings over 24 hours than people who ate the least sodium, researchers report in Hypertension.The study wasn’t a controlled experiment designed to prove whether or how dietary salt or other things people eat might directly alter blood pressure. "This can be as powerful as taking a drug prescription for high blood pressure. Potassium can help remove excess sodium from the body.Potassium appeared to weaken the connection between dietary salt and elevated blood pressure only for people who had low sodium levels in their urine, the researchers also found."There is data showing that when the DASH dietary pattern is combined with sodium reduction there are substantial effects on blood pressure," Anderson said